Skip to main content

The Problem

Requirements written without engineering validation produce unbuildable stories, missing acceptance criteria, and scope that expands mid-sprint. QA finds gaps after development — the most expensive moment to find them.

What It Does

Transforms a feature idea into a validated, dependency-sequenced backlog:
  • INVEST-scored user stories
  • Gherkin acceptance criteria
  • Flow gap analysis
  • Dependency-sequenced backlog ready for sprint
QA Lead agent validates all criteria before development begins.

Try It

activate nablr
Set agent to product_manager. Create requirements for [feature name]
Then validate before coding starts:
Set agent to qa_lead. Validate the requirements for testability
Full sequence:
Set agent to product_manager. Write requirements with AC for user authentication
Set agent to qa_lead. Validate AC testability and flag ambiguities
Set agent to architect. Design the system for user authentication

Expected Output

  • docs/requirements/STORY-XXX.md — user story with Gherkin AC
  • AC validation report — pass/fail per criterion
  • Dependency-sequenced backlog

Who This Is For

  • Product teams using AI to write tickets no one can build from
  • PMs at high-velocity startups
  • Delivery leads managing distributed or AI-assisted teams
Provide the feature name and one sentence of context upfront. The more specific the brief, the tighter the AC generated.